MediaTek's helplessness: obviously 5G chip performance is strong, launched early, but everyone e
As we all know, 2019 is called the 5G first year, because in 2019, more than 60 operators worldwide opened 5G networks. With the rollout of 5G networks, 5G mobile phones have arrived, and the most important of 5G mobile phones is the 5G chip.
So last year, a very important task for mobile phone chip manufacturers was to launch 5G chips. One of the most important tasks is how to launch 5G chips as early as possible to prove their strength.
Among them, Huawei should be the most outstanding. Barron 5000 is the world's first 5G baseband chip supporting SA / NSA, and Kirin 990 5G is the world's first integrated 5G chip.
In fact, MediaTek can also be regarded as powerful. The Teana 1000 series is also an earlier integrated 5G chip. It was released in November 2019 and is also an integrated 5G chip. The most important thing is that the performance of this chip is very powerful.
Since the Teana 1000 uses ARM's latest CrotexA77 and MaliG77, the Teana 1000 has surpassed the Kirin 990 5G in both CPU and GPU.
On the AI, the Teana 1000 is also very powerful, with the AI Benchmark running points leading the second place with Kirin 990 5G and Kirin 990 chips with 56158 total points.
It stands to reason that such a powerful chip should perform very well in the market. I never thought that a few months had passed. As far as the current situation is concerned, the current Teana 1000 is a grainless product. No mobile phone manufacturer uses its chip. On the contrary, it is later than the Qualcomm 865 series and 765G chips that some manufacturers are using. Does this make MediaTek particularly embarrassing?
The reason is that, in my opinion, the price of this chip is mainly high or low. According to online news, the chip set price is as high as $ 70, which is the most expensive chip ever used by MediaTek. They are difficult to choose.
If used on high-end machines, MediaTek chips are far less famous than Qualcomm. Why don't you buy Qualcomm chips? Used on mid-range machines, the price is again expensive, Qualcomm 765G is cheaper than it, and mid-range low-end is more suitable.
This makes the original manufacturer that said they want to support MediaTek, but ultimately did not choose the Teana 1000, and chose Qualcomm, which also made MediaTek very embarrassing, what do you think?